This is a longer rant about a significant shift in music currently happening. Worth debating – please chip in!
The Sonata and the Symphony as musical forms were introduced in the 1700s as what might be the first self-contained musical forms ever. These forms were similar in the sense that the had a closed structure with a climax towards the end. The novel was introduced in literature in this era as well in about the same time and with similar characteristics.
Why? For the first time ever art in a broader sense was given its own existence as a commodity. In the past, art was instrumental, not in a musical but in a broader utilitarian sense. As an example, music was used by e.g. the church og the nobility to support rituals and power, or it was used for recreational purposed, e.g. dance music. Music had a supporting role and hence it was not required to represent itself as an entity in its own right. It was often structured in a serial manner which supported the purpose well, in e.g. verses. Let us call it SEQUENCISM.
Enter the entertainment industry in a broader sense. With Concerts and Art Exhibitions as new art vehicles to satisfy the demands of the nascent bourgeosie, art – including music – responded to the new music demands by becoming more self-contained. Music played in a concert hall had to be self-contained in order not to be booed upon. With the utilitarian aspect (e.g. ceremony or dance) removed, the Work had to present itself as a seperate unit. Art wrapped itself into forms that did not need any external assistance, e.g. the novel, the sonata, the symphony. We still see the reamins of this in the entertainment industry where the verse-chorus structure of pop songs is rooted in the sonata and symphony forms of past centuries.
But new forms are emerging, fascinatingly similar to pre-industrialism’s sequencism. The whole raft of electronica genres and sub genres is dominated by it: a series of 4 bar segments, each consisting of a varying number of elements. Not only is this structure exercised by the many electronica genres, film music in its various shapes and sizes is often structured in a similar way. When music has a supporting role, its structure is determined by the primary message, i.e. the visual element, the dialogue, or both. Listen to the music in this product presentation. Go to http://www.sanzaboe.dk/examples.asp and click on the Danisco sample. Even though classical instruments play an important part in this piece, the structure is similar to electronica music: a series of sections predominantly consisting of 4 bars or multipla of 4 bars. It appears that this is in fact library music: pre-produced music aimed at being used for exactly this purpose
Why is it built this way? This particular structure very easily accomodates the needs of just about any film. You can add or remove instruments, motifs and patterns to vary the intensity. You can build towards a climax. You can reflect a change of pace. With a metronome count of 60, a typical 2/2 bar is 2 seconds, i.e. 4 bars are only 8 seconds. If 8 seconds is too long a period of time to wait for a change, you can roll up your sleeves and introduce the change within a segment.
With Digital Audio Workstations (DAWs) like Cubase, Pro Tools, FL Studio etc. it is very easy to manipulate this kind of sequences and to add or remove instruments and patterns so this is also a very practical approach to fulfilling the film’s needs. I had a personal go at this way of composing in this little piece: http://www.jakito.dk/web_2_0/english-filer/Moving%20Objects%20405.mp3 . This is a mockup actually composed to fit a specific commercial movie, it does not matter which particular one. Most important is that due to its structure of 4 bar segments it could quite easily be adapted to quite a lot of different films.
Quantitatively, I am convinced that sequencism is on the raise. If you count the minutes of music played and listened to in all contexts and media, I am quite sure that the share of sequencism is growing.
Does this mean the end of the beautiful, self-contained classical forms, or not? Probably not. At least not completely. But watch the sequencism spac